A way to think about our football players

One thing we are all guilty of is mixing hope with fact. The best way to analyse a player is not what they might do but how they actually play.

 

Start with Inu. He is not fast is a good finisher close to the line and can kick goals. If you think of him as a faster larger version of Hazem then you have a very good winger. If you hope he will bounce out and play like Inglis then you will be disappointed.

 

Mateo is a very good bench player who can off load a magic ball when players are tired. He lacks focus and has errors in his game and is also a large body which makes him a liability in the defensive line. If you think of him as a quality match winner from the bench (aka Dean Widders) then  you have a good player if we hope he is going to be B Kenny or Fittler then you will be disappointed

 

Hindy will make 40 tackles, flop on half of them, use his legs in half of them and run his big arse off. But he wont ever make a line break. Due to age he is more a better verion of Larsen (gary that is) than Clyde.

 

Try watching our players actually play and see what they do because that is what they will do. KK is not going to go out and play 7 like Joey because that is not how he plays. He is more a Craig Wing 14 off the bench.

 

Hoping that by moving Mateo to 6 and KK to 7 that you will have Freddie and Joey are wild when in fact we will have Widders and Sing and in my view no hope.

 

 

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I don't agree with you about Mateo. He is not a bench player, he needs to be in the starting side. Some people forget what he did for our team in 2008. Before Hayne was the superstar Feleti Mateo was our go to man. The only reason Mateo was coming off the bench last year was due to a long stint on the sideline from injury and the resulting lack of match fitness.

    I believe that when Mateo gets a bit of confidence in his game you will see another Parramatta side. To compare him to Dean Widders (as good as he was off the bench) is an insult to the talent of Mateo. Widders was an impact player, Mateo will win you the game.
  • Can you give me a game to rewatch from 2008 when he played 80 minutes of dominant 58 ?

    I think last year back half of the season when he played off the bench for limited bursts is his role.

    I hope your right but the facts of his past performances do not support the hope
    • I don't believe he is a 5/8. Mateo is at his best at lock, from what I recall he only went to 5/8 because we had injuries at the time.

      I think our halves combination should be KK and Morts with Robson coming off the bench (with Mitchell being introduced sometime during the season). Robson is a great back up half but that is all, he was originally bought for this reason but somehow became our first string 7. What does that say?

      I don't blame Robson for our Grand Final loss, he played well for our team, but I just can't help thinking that had we had a more naturally creative half, we would of had a better shot. At the time I would not of dropped him, he earned his spot to play in the GF, I just thought that Ando would have tried out the combo of Morts and KK by now since it seems that the future of our team centred around these guys in the halves.
  • Mister mediocre matt keating. He is our next mister never made a line break daniel wagon.
  • The warriors are not paying $400 000 for Mateo to play lock. Sad to see some fans have forgotten the talent of Mateo in here. When Ando finally puts Mateo in 5/8th with Morts at halfback, then attitudes and non believers will have a change of heart. Mateo/Morts halves combo is just a matter of time.
  • dude in my other posts ive backed mateo to only play number 6. i said if he is gonna stay at lock he should just go coz he is not a forward that the modern game needs. but he needs to increase his work ethic and load. coz he cnt last 80 minutes. and hes a waste at lock. sticky situation .
    • I don't really get why is Mateo thought by some to be a good option at lock. He is about the furthest thing from a good lock forward I can think of.

      A good lock is a tireless worker, solid defender and 'mop up' man. Mateo's strengths are his skill with the ball in hand. He is a born 5/8 for mine.

      Otherwise, yeah play him as an impact man off the bench. He is not an 80 min lock though. I reckon Horo should get a chance to tackle his bum off this week in that position.
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Bup replied to Eels2025's discussion Jake Averillo & Josh Kerr
"I wanted us to have a crack at Adam Elliot, Roosters and Souths are after him, looks like it'll be at the Roosters.
Word is Radleys done"
46 minutes ago
Kenny Power replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Canterbury hooker Reed Mahoney to join Cowboys on long-term deal
"If he wasnt released mid season , they would have tried very hard for next year. Have a feeling that's why richo released him early so dogs couldn't get him as they would have no cap or spots for this year"
1 hour ago
Hector replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Canterbury hooker Reed Mahoney to join Cowboys on long-term deal
"Well if that's the case we shouldn't have signed him hey . What the stuff are we talking about the dogs and Reed for .Anyway We got DaSiilva end of story and the Dogs didn't. Happy Days"
1 hour ago
macybrown replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Canterbury hooker Reed Mahoney to join Cowboys on long-term deal
"Reckon that's a good point you making there Byron ...I think it would've been extremely touch and go. Sounds like dogs stuffed up a bit hehe
I'd like to think it's good timing Reed!"
1 hour ago
More…