You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Need way more than that, majority of the players signed would be their depth. Even that is rubbish. As Johnny mentioned too, juniors will be hard to come by.
Look at their last two signings. Sorensen and Talakai. Sorensen is a fine signing for…"
Look at their last two signings. Sorensen and Talakai. Sorensen is a fine signing for…"
"They need a gun fullback and another forward who's a big name "
"Precisely. Just makes me think someone at NRL HQ - and we all know who - got a very large suitcase of cash from the WA state government for agreeing to this. "
"they will feed on ours."
Replies
Bevan is a fullback and Pritchard is made of glass and is a benchy at best.
Well...der!
Of course French can be a great halfback.
No- similar reason, I'm sick of seeing kaysa being dragged along hanging onto props legs. Gives away too many quick play the balls. Also very injury prone and would be targeted.
No- Scott is the best leader we have, French is just getting a feel for the game and is too soft spoken for a captain.
He'd have to tackle like any other halfback. We also have the type of forward pack, defence driven that could easily help him.
Why stick the most exciting player that we have brought through for some time, on the wing or at the back? Particularly with the general shortage of top line halves around.
Semi to fullback or Centre
Hayne back in the day, y'all wanted to move him to five eight
Gutho from his wing/centre to five eight.
Why do we always want to play people out of position?
i agree in general with this statement on backrowers, but wanting to move wingers is because wing is a limited position with less influence on winning a match, in semi's case they also want to earn more money, just as michael gordon once did
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next