3 - Why we need Peats in 2017

5/8: Norm, Foz and Hayne

Hooker: Peats, De Gois and Pritchard

FB: Hayne, French, Gutherson

If we kept Peats we would have had three FG quality players for each 3 spine positions.

Now we are unbalanced

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • At the moment it doesnt even look like we will be keeping foz
    • touche

  • Wile, i'm assuming the "Foz" is a typo.

    That whacko's gone, thank God :)

    • I couldn't tell yet whether it was true or rumour 

  • Peats was offered unrealistic money elsewhere. He would have had to take a massive pay cut to stay.

    It's the correct decision by Arthur.

    Anyone doubting Brad Arthur should be banned immediately from this site.
    • but we need 3 hookers

      • you wouldnt know what to do with 1 hooker let alone three.

  • Spot on chief!!!
  • It would be great to have had one of either;
    A) hayne, foran and peats, or
    B) hayne, norman and peats.

    As opposed to;

    C) hayne, norman, foran and pritchard.

    But what do I know...
    • Hayne,Norman and Foran over peats anyday of the week for me. Peats would of wanted way to much money for his worth.
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Frank The Tank replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels jerseys 6:00 today 👀
"This reminds me of.....
The cream, the bone, the white, the off white, the ivory or the beige. 😂😂😂"
2 hours ago
Frank The Tank replied to LB's discussion Parramatta sign New Zealand cross-code convert
"Exciting news.......🙄🙄"
3 hours ago
Cumberland Eel replied to LB's discussion Parramatta sign New Zealand cross-code convert
"To watch or participate "
3 hours ago
Cumberland Eel replied to LB's discussion Parramatta sign New Zealand cross-code convert
"Be good when we get some news of a replacement for Lomax instead of buying junior players "
3 hours ago
More…