The problem is not Biden (ORF Season blog)

it is the MSM deliberately trying to control what people think with blatant lies and acting as one - and it goes deeper.

Biden corruption is just one example e.g. see

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qdt58NNQri8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGVc5F_l8XQ

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • LOL - the people will get the politicians the World Wide contolled Murdoch media wants them to have.

     

    PA Union Boss: Biden scares me now

    • Its much more than just Murdoch

  • https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/10/21/bombshell-statement-b...

    Bombshell: Biden Insider Claims He Was 'Recipient of the Email'
    A whistleblower CEO and Biden insider said he personally saw Joe Biden discussing business deals with his son, Hunter Biden.
  • 8218550076?profile=RESIZE_930x

    • Wrong, America is the big loser.!!!

  • This reply was deleted.
    • 8218908092?profile=RESIZE_930x

      • This reply was deleted.
        • Technically, that's irrelevant. See, the adjective "rich" is meant to modify the noun "loser", but Trump is a loser no matter how one tries to modify it. 
          Grammar. Gotta love it. 

  • Don't underestimate Sleepy Joe

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Well why say yes to the question we wanted him long term?"
2 minutes ago
Tin Tim replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"It was explained at the time, but some here still had their own thoughts & like most of the time the people here were wrong. "
9 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Mate, im just asking you which one is correct?  Your the one that said the second version is incorrect as Anasta is  protecting the Eels 
Prove it LB"
10 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Others are putting more trust in the other version.  
When i posted this blog I didn't see both versions.   Im just saying both can't be correct,  and how would anyone prove which one is. 
So you're saying the second version is bs - prove it.
What…"
12 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Well it was, don't trigger the option. To trigger the option he would have known the deal before doing that. He wasn't doing a Zac Lomax."
24 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Oh they are definately not backing him. Coby Black signing means Sanders is not the long term answer as they are not moving Strange either. 
But what didn't work? Is that something we want to invest in?"
33 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Right, so if someone said they did something illegal, then a few months later said loud and clear they didn't do it that means they are innocent?
Sorry Chief makes no sense what you are saying. You say do not jump to conclusions if we don't know the…"
35 minutes ago
HKF replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Staying in Melbourne next season was not an option after he elected to take up the option of getting out of his contract. "
39 minutes ago
MeelK replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Chief, I think you mean you'd put more trust in the version that suits your narrative... "
42 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Oh yeah it could have started with us reaching out wanting long term, Pezet saying he wanted to play 7, Brisbane coming in and wanting him but not til 2027. He either stayed at Melbourne for 2026 or played FG at Parramatta in 2026 and we felt there…"
44 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Fair enough, Adam. Also, I agree with you that Walker has the footy IQ to be a stop-gap. Not sure it'll come to that though. Still, I suspect Ryles likes high-IQ halves; even at six.
One theme in his era has been raising the average IQ across the…"
48 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"I don't think they're preferencing either right now. Renzo got an opportunity in NSW Cup last season and given our focus on finding a long-term 5/8 I think he's probably further ahead development-wise. Renzo has been extended to the end of 2028 and…"
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"And Anasta said it loud and clear in yesterday's podcast aswell.   
No.use jumping to conclusions if we don't know the real answer.  
This blog is concerning the Kayo podcast.  Where he wasn't promoted by his mates, and he wasn't drunk on his Bali…"
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"LB, good post mate. The thing is: Reality trumps whatever we agree or disagree with. Roosters signed DCE for a year. Panthers signed Lussick for a year. We signed Pezet for a year.
So, we're making mountains out of ant mounds on here about it…"
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Eelawarra's discussion THE EELS SUPERTEE
"Yes. Great initiative.  Well done to everyone "
1 hour ago
Blue Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"We must really really have some talent in our next gen pathways. Looking forward to that, actually long term strategy plays a huge part here. If youngsters feel they will get a shot at first grade, then they are more likely to come to the Eels as 15…"
1 hour ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>