Replies

  • Apparently just informimg public and not using camera for prosecution - at this stage. But with career beaurocrats running the show world wide -who think that the end justifies the means and that they have moral superiority to determine the ideal ends..this is getting 1984-like and we did not win the GF 1984 - although we got close

  • maybe spot should ref a nrl game

  • 4893439074?profile=RESIZE_400x

  • Great idea Wile, are they mass-produced so we can get one on every corner of a street.

  • LOL - read a ScFi book with these Law enforcement dogs being used - only difference was they were equipped with automatic guns.

    Kick it on its side and see how good it is.

    I robot Memes - Imgflip

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Poppa replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels reject Melbourne Storm’s audacious bid to sign Zac Lomax for 2026 season
"I cannot believe for one minute that we have paid more than 700k for those 2 combined 
My guess is 250 and 350 no more.....rhetoric is that Anasta said we got Pezet redicoulously cheap and you would not pay more than 350 for Kelly and don't forget…"
30 seconds ago
Poupou Escobar replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels reject Melbourne Storm’s audacious bid to sign Zac Lomax for 2026 season
"I don't think any trade will be for 2026 because our cap would be close to full. We have two spots left and they would be for minimum salary backups, not for anyone who would make our top 17."
59 seconds ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"Well it's weird as he has a contract and also doesn't? I guess the wording is rights. It's like NFL, when Tampa signed Brady, Gronk came out of retirement but Tampa had to trade a 4th round pick to New England as they had his rights.
i guess Parra…"
18 minutes ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"100% carlo"
29 minutes ago
Yehez replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels reject Melbourne Storm’s audacious bid to sign Zac Lomax for 2026 season
"Yes. Even Pahulu and say Meaney would be good (I know he's Perth bound but as an example)"
37 minutes ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"Its the vibe."
39 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels reject Melbourne Storm’s audacious bid to sign Zac Lomax for 2026 season
""
1 hour ago
Acme replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels reject Melbourne Storm’s audacious bid to sign Zac Lomax for 2026 season
"I'd try to argue that it's not a restriction of trade as he signed the release that he instigated a matter of weeks ago, and he also has at least 1 offer from Rugby at $400k a season.  I reckon he's absolutey stitched himself up by leaving the Eels…"
1 hour ago
Eli Stephens replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"I actually think eventually we will release him but make him sweat him it out, definitely don't let him out this season. Make him wait 1 or 2 lol. "
1 hour ago
Michael W. replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"If Lomax wins, it will set a precedent that any player can get out of their contract at any time. All they have to do is say they want to try another sport, then 6 weeks down the track change their mind and sign with whoever they want. This is no…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels reject Melbourne Storm’s audacious bid to sign Zac Lomax for 2026 season
"I would take Howarth, but only for an extra player on top. Howarth has Origin potential and even be a great back-rower. But add in say a Pahulu for example and that's a deal."
1 hour ago
fishbulb replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels reject Melbourne Storm’s audacious bid to sign Zac Lomax for 2026 season
"Thing is we're not holding on to him. He's been released from his contract, he is costing the club nothing. The terms of the release are that he can't play for another nrl club for the term of the contract he signed with us without the club's…"
1 hour ago
The Badger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels reject Melbourne Storm’s audacious bid to sign Zac Lomax for 2026 season
"Maybe 2 players and they pay at least half."
1 hour ago
The Badger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels reject Melbourne Storm’s audacious bid to sign Zac Lomax for 2026 season
"He is already gone."
1 hour ago
Parra fan on The Hill replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels reject Melbourne Storm’s audacious bid to sign Zac Lomax for 2026 season
"If not the Storm, then some other club but he needs to be traded. No point in hanging onto someone that doesnt want to play for you when his value it high.
All I ask for is once he's gone and comes up against Parra, a good old cannonball tackle…"
1 hour ago
The Captain replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels reject Melbourne Storm’s audacious bid to sign Zac Lomax for 2026 season
"That ain't like for like. Unless the Storm are paying considerable freight as well."
2 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Tin Tim on Wednesday
Views: 1825

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 179

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>