ABC NEWS By Emma Elsworthy

Several people walking past a large ship, as the Sydney Harbour Bridge can be seen in the background
 

The Australian Border Force (ABF) has confirmed it received a concerned phone call from the state port authority about the Ruby Princess, hours before the cruise ship was due to dock.

Key points:

  • The Ruby Princess has been at the centre of a blame game between the ABF and the NSW Government
  • The ABF maintains NSW Health cleared the ill-fated vessel to dock in Sydney
  • The vessel has been linked to hundreds of COVID-19 cases and 15 deaths

The NSW Port Authority contacted the ABF in the early hours of March 19 and expressed "concern in relation to the health of the passengers".

The ABF said in a statement today the cruise ship was cleared to dock by NSW Health.

"The ABF officer made internal enquiries and subsequently advised the NSW Port Authority that the vessel had been cleared by NSW Health," an ABF statement said.

A report from Nine newspapers said the ABF officer instructed a Sydney harbour master to allow the ship to dock.

The ABF clarified it "did not seek to shape or influence any view or decision by the NSW Port Authority".

"This is not ABF's role," the statement said.

The Ruby Princess has been linked to multiple clusters of coronavirus cases in NSW and interstate since its 2,700 passengers alighted the ship without proper isolation protocol in place.

Fifteen deaths and at least 600 cases of COVID-19 have been officially linked to the cruise liner, meaning it is the single biggest source of coronavirus infections in Australia. 

 

When asked about who bore culpability last month for the ship docking in Sydney, NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian responded, "all of us have to take responsibility".

But on March 25, ABF Commissioner Michael Outram said the NSW health department had given the green light for passengers to disembark, despite several people on board being tested for coronavirus.

"The Department of Agriculture officials advised my officers that NSW Health had conducted a risk assessment, had rated the risk as low and that health officials would not be attending the vessel," he said.

"As a result of that information, all of the passengers were given a green light to disembark."

Earlier this week, NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller announced the commencement of a criminal investigation into the communications and actions that led to the ship's docking and disembarking.

 

More than 30 officers from State Crime, Counter-Terrorism and Special Tactics and Marine Area Commands have begun investigating the Ruby Princess debacle.

Investigators will interview high-priority witnesses in coming days, but they urged those with relevant information to contact Crime Stoppers.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Current system selects for turkeys who can't see the big picture but mindlessly follow technicalities. Often the cause big stuff ups when the technicalities are out of context.

    Let me guess the applied their risk assessment algorithm and got low risk and the guidelines said no intervention. Never mind that any fool who stood back and looked at the big picture could tell that this was high risk. This was late in the game and well known that cruise ships were coronavirus incubators and if one was positive then many were. And that it was likely that one was positive.

    • You are correct WEC.

      When I was at work and people said 'when we ran a risk assessment", I would automatically ask can I see it.

      Usually, it meant, there wasn't one and they made the decision in their head.

      Secondly, if they did show there is usually many flaws due to it being quite simplistic or the indicators are weighted incorrectly or it was just a tick and flick exercise.

      Thirdly from a professional point of view, they properly haven't even asked the right question. In other word did they first look at the threat or they haven't collected data and spoken to people at the coal face. 

      I could go on and on, but I will leave it at that. 

       

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Joeyboyz replied to Johnny Suede's discussion The Tele has ranked the Eels forward pack 9th for season '26 (Roosters at #1)
"I reckon the Warriors are better than the Rooters and the Broncos.
 "
1 hour ago
GM replied to GM's discussion Not Smart…JAC
"Then don't fkn read it"
4 hours ago
Yehez replied to Johnny Suede's discussion The Tele has ranked the Eels forward pack 9th for season '26 (Roosters at #1)
"How is the Storm pack second best????"
5 hours ago
Yehez replied to Clintorian's discussion Is Toby Rudolph worth chasing?
"No.
As a couple have said, our forward line is good, for it to become great we need to either get a big dog (a Keoan minimum), or one of our youngster, at this moment likely Tuivati, comes of age and becomes the much vaunted "alpha!". 
The likes of…"
5 hours ago
fishbulb replied to Johnny Suede's discussion The Tele has ranked the Eels forward pack 9th for season '26 (Roosters at #1)
"It's kinda a bit of puff. It's built on an aaaumption that the most effective style of play will be the same as last year. Wouldn't be surprised if it's based of a straight reading of last year's stats. No guarantee that any of it will be repeated.…"
5 hours ago
fishbulb replied to GM's discussion Not Smart…JAC
"Nothing to see here. A beat-up."
5 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Clintorian's discussion Is Toby Rudolph worth chasing?
"too funny flow"
6 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to GM's discussion Not Smart…JAC
"LOL,,,Hi Yawn, Can you give this blog an approved yawn please?
 "
6 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Clintorian's discussion Is Toby Rudolph worth chasing?
"sharks might be keen to offload him in 2026 to create some cap space. They have some good juniors coming up and will give these guys a nudge. Could get him for a reasonable deal and it sounds like Sharks aren't giving him much if he's calling around."
6 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to GM's discussion Not Smart…JAC
"The headline by GM is awful but I don;t mind seeing what the scum-sucking slime-crawlers have to say about us."
6 hours ago
Yawn replied to GM's discussion Not Smart…JAC
"What ? Do you want a comment from me ? At least start with "Hi Yawn' and I'll respond."
6 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to GM's discussion Not Smart…JAC
"it's going to get worse"
6 hours ago
Blue Eel replied to GM's discussion Not Smart…JAC
"yeah i think your right, a real scraping the bottom of the barrel attempt by the author. "
7 hours ago
Colin Good commented on Colin Good’s status
"Randy young fellow ,you don’t know the difference between an eggplant and a pumpkin, that’s dumb ."
7 hours ago
ParraEels replied to GM's discussion Not Smart…JAC
"Such a stupid post "
7 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to GM's discussion Not Smart…JAC
"Issa seems the type of guy who our current opponents may get to try to come at us sideways and start some internal fractures. Get us shittalking ourselves. Nuh-uh
Maybe paranoid, but we need to stick solid  by our guys, regardless of what smears…"
7 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1977

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 272

 

Is Toby Rudolph worth chasing?

I was reading a Fox news article today about Toby Rudolph without a Manager and having to call other coaches himself to understand what he's worth to them before he can negotiate with the Sharks. Rudolph is definitely a player we should at least…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Yehez 5 hours ago
Views: 445

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>