ABC NEWS By Emma Elsworthy

Several people walking past a large ship, as the Sydney Harbour Bridge can be seen in the background
 

The Australian Border Force (ABF) has confirmed it received a concerned phone call from the state port authority about the Ruby Princess, hours before the cruise ship was due to dock.

Key points:

  • The Ruby Princess has been at the centre of a blame game between the ABF and the NSW Government
  • The ABF maintains NSW Health cleared the ill-fated vessel to dock in Sydney
  • The vessel has been linked to hundreds of COVID-19 cases and 15 deaths

The NSW Port Authority contacted the ABF in the early hours of March 19 and expressed "concern in relation to the health of the passengers".

The ABF said in a statement today the cruise ship was cleared to dock by NSW Health.

"The ABF officer made internal enquiries and subsequently advised the NSW Port Authority that the vessel had been cleared by NSW Health," an ABF statement said.

A report from Nine newspapers said the ABF officer instructed a Sydney harbour master to allow the ship to dock.

The ABF clarified it "did not seek to shape or influence any view or decision by the NSW Port Authority".

"This is not ABF's role," the statement said.

The Ruby Princess has been linked to multiple clusters of coronavirus cases in NSW and interstate since its 2,700 passengers alighted the ship without proper isolation protocol in place.

Fifteen deaths and at least 600 cases of COVID-19 have been officially linked to the cruise liner, meaning it is the single biggest source of coronavirus infections in Australia. 

 

When asked about who bore culpability last month for the ship docking in Sydney, NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian responded, "all of us have to take responsibility".

But on March 25, ABF Commissioner Michael Outram said the NSW health department had given the green light for passengers to disembark, despite several people on board being tested for coronavirus.

"The Department of Agriculture officials advised my officers that NSW Health had conducted a risk assessment, had rated the risk as low and that health officials would not be attending the vessel," he said.

"As a result of that information, all of the passengers were given a green light to disembark."

Earlier this week, NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller announced the commencement of a criminal investigation into the communications and actions that led to the ship's docking and disembarking.

 

More than 30 officers from State Crime, Counter-Terrorism and Special Tactics and Marine Area Commands have begun investigating the Ruby Princess debacle.

Investigators will interview high-priority witnesses in coming days, but they urged those with relevant information to contact Crime Stoppers.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Current system selects for turkeys who can't see the big picture but mindlessly follow technicalities. Often the cause big stuff ups when the technicalities are out of context.

    Let me guess the applied their risk assessment algorithm and got low risk and the guidelines said no intervention. Never mind that any fool who stood back and looked at the big picture could tell that this was high risk. This was late in the game and well known that cruise ships were coronavirus incubators and if one was positive then many were. And that it was likely that one was positive.

    • You are correct WEC.

      When I was at work and people said 'when we ran a risk assessment", I would automatically ask can I see it.

      Usually, it meant, there wasn't one and they made the decision in their head.

      Secondly, if they did show there is usually many flaws due to it being quite simplistic or the indicators are weighted incorrectly or it was just a tick and flick exercise.

      Thirdly from a professional point of view, they properly haven't even asked the right question. In other word did they first look at the threat or they haven't collected data and spoken to people at the coal face. 

      I could go on and on, but I will leave it at that. 

       

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Paulo standoff with Eels
"Though Coryn, we aren't giving Ryles what he needs, but where are the players dying to play for him? His message is not strong enough to pry them over. I mean BA at least was able to get some decent signings. He got Lomax basically on his own."
2 minutes ago
LB replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Paulo standoff with Eels
"He is also 19, let's see him after 2027 then pass judgement."
3 minutes ago
LB replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Paulo standoff with Eels
"To us, his value is only one year, until Talagi and Koina are ready. Once they are, he is expendable to us."
4 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Yes well.Super, you were making excuses for Sarantinos when I was pushing out blogs on why he should be ousted.    You were one of those people hellbent on making sure Sarantinos was untouchable.   Seems like a case of politics before on feild…"
7 minutes ago
Bourbon Man replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"What does that mean? Who are these people?
Seriously guys - if you know something then let us all know. Otherwise it justs sounds like you are just making shit up. "
13 minutes ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to shane's discussion Dragons land rising Eels winger The talented outside back has picked up a new deal in 2027 after a breakout junior season. Leo Twemlow Leo Twemlow WRITER | September 20, 2026 - 7:33am 1,462 The St G
"thanks EA"
17 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Holbrook wasn't signed by Newcastle until September 2025. By then Brown, Mooney and Saulo had already signed. The only player recruited to the Knights after Holbrook signed was Sandon Smith who was happily released by the Roosters.
Peter O'Sullivan…"
50 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Exactly BA had to go through more than any other coach in nrl history off the field JR has had an easy ride in comparison don't worry about that discussion with Chief I told him that 3 years ago."
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Holbrook who did he recruit he hasn't been there long enough.
DB is a OSullivan hire I think moreso he's the key.
Dolphins and Knoghts look eerily similar athletically."
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Paulo standoff with Eels
"This is what happens when you can't recruit you have these struggles.
We can't afford to let him go because we lack experience if we had have landed Barnett or Kolomatangi the club holds the cards in this negotiation.If we don't sign him and we go…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"BA also dealt with the same people that are letting Ryles down apparently? So for BA it was on him as well but Ryles has excuses?"
1 hour ago
adnan replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Paulo standoff with Eels
"Gutho Dejavu "
1 hour ago
JC replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Did the warriors get ripped on more than a few calls?, yes they did but they only have themselves to blame for the loss.  They totally dominated the first have but only managed to score 6 points, they should have scored at least 18. The warriors…"
2 hours ago
Mitchy replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Paulo standoff with Eels
"It's the off season and his manager is amping it up no doubt as he knows from past contracts that we will buckle! And that there is little else on market unless you look at Reggie's / Massey etc. "
2 hours ago
Mitchy replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"In answer to your questions - some very questionable calls. The ref again is the same ref who's at times made some strange calls but the bunker has been a disaster. PVL allowed Klein to ref following his issues with gambling and yet nothing to see…"
2 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Warriors choked again just like in 2023. "
3 hours ago
More…

 

Warriors injustice?

No warriors fan but seriously some of the worst refereeing or more so inaction of the bunker that I’ve ever seen. This game has gone to shit. The Cherry Evans no penalty / sin bin was bad enough but that shit was just appeasing the betting…

Read more…
25 Replies · Reply by Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 7 minutes ago
Views: 778

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>