ABC NEWS By Emma Elsworthy

Several people walking past a large ship, as the Sydney Harbour Bridge can be seen in the background
 

The Australian Border Force (ABF) has confirmed it received a concerned phone call from the state port authority about the Ruby Princess, hours before the cruise ship was due to dock.

Key points:

  • The Ruby Princess has been at the centre of a blame game between the ABF and the NSW Government
  • The ABF maintains NSW Health cleared the ill-fated vessel to dock in Sydney
  • The vessel has been linked to hundreds of COVID-19 cases and 15 deaths

The NSW Port Authority contacted the ABF in the early hours of March 19 and expressed "concern in relation to the health of the passengers".

The ABF said in a statement today the cruise ship was cleared to dock by NSW Health.

"The ABF officer made internal enquiries and subsequently advised the NSW Port Authority that the vessel had been cleared by NSW Health," an ABF statement said.

A report from Nine newspapers said the ABF officer instructed a Sydney harbour master to allow the ship to dock.

The ABF clarified it "did not seek to shape or influence any view or decision by the NSW Port Authority".

"This is not ABF's role," the statement said.

The Ruby Princess has been linked to multiple clusters of coronavirus cases in NSW and interstate since its 2,700 passengers alighted the ship without proper isolation protocol in place.

Fifteen deaths and at least 600 cases of COVID-19 have been officially linked to the cruise liner, meaning it is the single biggest source of coronavirus infections in Australia. 

 

When asked about who bore culpability last month for the ship docking in Sydney, NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian responded, "all of us have to take responsibility".

But on March 25, ABF Commissioner Michael Outram said the NSW health department had given the green light for passengers to disembark, despite several people on board being tested for coronavirus.

"The Department of Agriculture officials advised my officers that NSW Health had conducted a risk assessment, had rated the risk as low and that health officials would not be attending the vessel," he said.

"As a result of that information, all of the passengers were given a green light to disembark."

Earlier this week, NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller announced the commencement of a criminal investigation into the communications and actions that led to the ship's docking and disembarking.

 

More than 30 officers from State Crime, Counter-Terrorism and Special Tactics and Marine Area Commands have begun investigating the Ruby Princess debacle.

Investigators will interview high-priority witnesses in coming days, but they urged those with relevant information to contact Crime Stoppers.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Current system selects for turkeys who can't see the big picture but mindlessly follow technicalities. Often the cause big stuff ups when the technicalities are out of context.

    Let me guess the applied their risk assessment algorithm and got low risk and the guidelines said no intervention. Never mind that any fool who stood back and looked at the big picture could tell that this was high risk. This was late in the game and well known that cruise ships were coronavirus incubators and if one was positive then many were. And that it was likely that one was positive.

    • You are correct WEC.

      When I was at work and people said 'when we ran a risk assessment", I would automatically ask can I see it.

      Usually, it meant, there wasn't one and they made the decision in their head.

      Secondly, if they did show there is usually many flaws due to it being quite simplistic or the indicators are weighted incorrectly or it was just a tick and flick exercise.

      Thirdly from a professional point of view, they properly haven't even asked the right question. In other word did they first look at the threat or they haven't collected data and spoken to people at the coal face. 

      I could go on and on, but I will leave it at that. 

       

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Hell On Eels’s discussion was featured
 

The free-falling Eels are staring down the barrel of another nail in their season’s coffin. They sit like ducks in the target arrow of the public's microscope just waiting to dissect their ANZAC performance.
Despite the Eagles superior position…
15 minutes ago
EA replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 8 Team List v Manly Warringah Sea Eagles (ANZAC Round)
"Sanders defence in the halves is actually better than Hands. NSW Cup stats would back this statement up as well. Hands is actually a poor defender in the halves. He is barely cup quality in cup. Hands is an out and out hooker in my opnion."
35 minutes ago
parra supporter replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 8 Team List v Manly Warringah Sea Eagles (ANZAC Round)
"I see hands on the bench as coverage for sanders in case his defence doesn't hold up rather than just to relieve lussick."
51 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Ethan Sanders inks three-year deal with Raiders
"Many here are saying "I hope he stays" etc. He is stupid if he did. His path is blocked unless Brown refuses his option. Even then Talagi could be a chance to play 6. Sanders was not going to stick around when he could play FG straight away from…"
1 hour ago
KENDOZA replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Ethan Sanders inks three-year deal with Raiders
"Parramatta never offered him a contract great work recruitment team our depth is running thin as it is. To busy trying to get Mitchell Pearce out if retirement "
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 8 Team List v Manly Warringah Sea Eagles (ANZAC Round)
"Perhaps, again we do not know until Friday with some evidence. It could be coming into a team that is low on form and confidence but coming out to prove a point he can ride the wave of energy. But at same time Manly, at Brooky, coming off an average…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 8 Team List v Manly Warringah Sea Eagles (ANZAC Round)
"Again, i feel this is a bad game to bring Sanders in, if he was to be named at all it should have been from the start against Wests. I was never a fan of putting him in to start as same with Talagi, i said Asi from day 1. But said Talagi as 2…"
1 hour ago
Xman replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 8 Team List v Manly Warringah Sea Eagles (ANZAC Round)
"Sanders might do well but he should have come in against tigers not against dce and turbo. Cherry koula and Saab are going to have a field day, watch manly spread it early with our compressed defence and lack of speed with Harper and sivo and cross…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 8 Team List v Manly Warringah Sea Eagles (ANZAC Round)
"That is where im surprised BA didn't persevere with Talagi on the bench incase Gutho's knees give way later in the game."
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 8 Team List v Manly Warringah Sea Eagles (ANZAC Round)
"8 & 10 are the same position."
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 8 Team List v Manly Warringah Sea Eagles (ANZAC Round)
"Oh Michael go away i have said on other comments i know it doesn't mean anything, i said that, i know he will play his natural game, so maybe read the comment before jumping down my throat. Just saying it is BA giving an f you by sticking with Brown…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 8 Team List v Manly Warringah Sea Eagles (ANZAC Round)
"Had they beat GC well i would agree. The fact they nearly got ran down, they will be up."
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 8 Team List v Manly Warringah Sea Eagles (ANZAC Round)
"We know who the part timers were."
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 8 Team List v Manly Warringah Sea Eagles (ANZAC Round)
"Hands is just a simple, steady Hooker. Can be a knock on him but where we are at this stage it is a positive."
1 hour ago
Hugo replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 8 Team List v Manly Warringah Sea Eagles (ANZAC Round)
"I'm sure it will all pan out according to the master coaches plan. "
2 hours ago
Muttman replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 8 Team List v Manly Warringah Sea Eagles (ANZAC Round)
"Very well said.  I personally did my part to help ensure the constitutional reforms happened and overall they've been an outstanding success. As you say, from a corporate viewpoint the Eels are extremely successful. All the necessary boxes have been…"
2 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>