Social Blogs

Pou mentioned Ayn Rand in one of his posts which grabbed my attension. Some  of her thinking is where an Artist  who I think is one of the best thoughout  Art history is having an immense intellectual battle with the the establishments who have shaped the way we live. The Philosophers who have changed the world --maybe for ever ---according to Rand were two German philosophers in the late 1800,s .Kant and Hegel.She is highly regarded and also very controvesial as well. She talks about subjects often raised on this site by Wizz and Others. Brett Allen  and many others have some strong views on some of  these topics and often participates with his values with which I have no issues .Her views may be confronting to some.. I am not trying to provoke division but maybe some reflection on how you fit in the bigger scheme of things. She discusses topics like the meaning of Life and Death, Politics, Morality, Selfishness, Those in control of Education institutions and how much damage they are doing. One subject that interests me and has changed my view is something Chocolate Frog often talks about--Perceptions of Reality--I think CF is in the Hegal camp on this. It still is the orf seezun

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAFKnfN4bfk&t=15s

 

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • TAD - interesting left of field topic. For practical purposes: How would you best summarise these different philiosophical camps ?

    It's been years (well decades), since I studied philosophy. The Hegel's, Kant's, Plato's or Socrates'. I literally can't recall details. Maybe a summary from your perspective would help if or when you have time.

    The Buddhist approach, rings truthful for me, where there are two realities, or "Two Truths": the "Relative" (appearances) and the "Absolute". Most of us usually operate on the relative level because it appears more tangible and is more acceptable. Socially and psychologically. The absolute is more abstract and appears less relevant to solid world we live in. 

    For example a table looks solid. It feels solid. For all intents and purposes it is solid. But, is it? If we were to suggest it wasn't really, we'd be seen as a nut-job. And yet, in truth, on a deeper more molecular level it is primarily not-solid: it is 99% space. One of the reasons I love using the words: "it appears" LOL.

    As such CF's: "perception is reality" would align itself to a more relative or subjective truth. Even the idea of the Two Truths is a relative truth, ultimately: A finger pointing the moon, but not the moon itself.

    Anyway, apologies if I'm muddying the waters. Just adding my 2 cents.

    • HOE----" Muddying the waters" Very difficult to encapsulate all of this mate. But will try and do so from how I read Odd Nerdrum,s understanding of Philosophy regarding Kant Hegel and Aristotle. Ayn Rand is a strong critique of Hegal. Nerdrm is a Nowegian in his mid 70,s. He studied the best Classic Artists from Titian,Carravagio, Rembrandt primarily and developed thieir work to this level

      930582592?profile=RESIZE_930x

      His pallet is only 4 colours Black white yellow and red

      Aristotlle was a round 550 BC{ I think-] He argued that reason is the only way for society to move forward. Ancient Greece was very sophisticated in so many areas of Government around humanism and developing a society based on peace, competition towards higher achievement and valuing  talent, seeking,uniformity of perception with a common understanding of reality. Lot of movement on a downward slide through to the Dark Ages of chaos and irrationality. Eg anti human values, poor governance, Religious brutality, witchcraft nonsense beliefs etc .The Renaissance turned all that around where aesthetics, Governance and reason became the foundation of society.Lots of great names surfaced under this revival of Ancient Greek scholarship eg Da Vinci,Michelangalo, Brunalesci etc {sp}

      Things moved along well in cultutal development seeking to build on what people learnt from historical masters.

      Kant published a book in 1790  called The Critique of Judgement which according to Nerdrum and Rand countered all of Aristotles thinking and changed the worldin the way we think and live.. For him genius was actions untainted by empiracle knowledge. Expression is nether good or bad . Anything new is Genius done well or bad. No standards of excellance based on competition,natural or learnt talent from the bank of previous learning. With Art we had Rembrandt

      930722924?profile=RESIZE_930x

      to this

      930728829?profile=RESIZE_930x

      and this

      930749814?profile=RESIZE_930x

      For Kant genius is creating something which no one has ever seen before. Building on what masters learnt from previous masters have done was irrelevant and its vlue was downgraded.

      Hegel followed Kant saying work that doesn,tadhere to the values of its time has no value

      Marx continued this thinking by saying Art should follow political tendancies rather than historical achievement

      Education institutions continued that dogma after Kant and his followers ever since. Value is on the new and different rather than actual talent . How does it apply to all other aspects of the way we live since Kant in other life interests ? 

      Pop music is always looking for something different-- The next new thing to come on the market. Extend perceptions of realities towards differentness. Is that destructive in a culture that is becoming alienated because people cant keep up with such rapid change and value systems. Are we really haveing a community where people understand some commonality of belonging to aplace where communication means something. Do people read good quality talented literature amongst the noise of social media. Do people communicate with people or with phonesetc. Has Kant destroyed motivation for talented people to pursue thier craft in a system where their is no judgement on good or bad when judgement is on being different irrespective of quality and how does that filter to everything else we do.

      Not sure if it makes sense but probably going back to Rand some of it may become clearer.

      The world seems to be one big mess with so much divisiveness in so many ways that we now perceive reality through the philosophy of Kant where anything goes and talent takes a backward value. Look at your own area of expertise in anything you do--Is their a sense of competition and reward for people to excell when mediocrity is rewarded.

      This painting sold at Christies London for 3 million English pounds recently930871104?profile=RESIZE_930x

      who studies anything done before Kant anymore?

      • HOE Lots of holes in how I put this together .Philosophy is something you try a figure out in a lifetime.

        Aristotle is about reasoning and bringing peoples perceptions together and working towards higher achievements in humanism. Kant is someone who esposes genus by valuing differentness and not quality of the endeavour. That is destroying perceptions of reality ,creating an alienated populace based on different perceptions of reality and insensitivity to Humanism, pain and suffering for people and animal live as well as the planet. Probably the best way I can put it. Valuing differentness as opposed to reaching higher states of  fullfilment in your endeavours in life centered about building on achievements of history

        • TAD - I really appreciate the considerable effort you put into summary. There's a lot to digest. And I will look into what you covered in more detail. The Arts and philosophy have always had influence on each other; and society.

    • I think you missed the best of the modern

      Descartes

      Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it.

      It is not enough to have a good mind; the main thing is to use it well.

       (I think; therefore I am.)

       

       

       

      • Yes Poppa "It is not enough to have a good mind; the main thing is to use it well."  That may be our problem--so much friggin noise out there you don,t have time to think. The meaning of life issues always hit me when I go to someones funeral or visit a cemetry.

  • Stepping back a bit and looking at Rand's philosophy - I have selected a few of her thoughts and quotes.

    932107367?profile=RESIZE_710x

    932121258?profile=RESIZE_710x

    932135494?profile=RESIZE_710x

    932140101?profile=RESIZE_710x

    932145857?profile=RESIZE_710x

    Though, I do admire the "heroic" laissez-faire individual in her "Objectivism" philosophy: the independant-minded free-sprited individual, with supreme reasoning powers - I see one major fatalic flaw in her reasoning. Individualism is fine and would work perfectly as she sees - if we were all islands unto ourselves. But we're not. In truth. The whole world, cosmos is inter-connected. Broader considerations are needed.

    And also, if capitalism is the best solution as she proposes, why is the world in such a mess ? The proof is in the pudding.

    Capitalism will always leave a mess because the intent behind it is about competitiveness over co-operation and working together. Socialism became state capitalism - so that's no good either. Humanity has a long way to go my friend.

    • I have some issues in parts of what she is saying--maybe don,t fully undestand it---The proof is in the pudding or the reincarnated spirit of growth from learning from past  humanist masters. Pre Kant--after Kant

      933904731?profile=RESIZE_930x

       

      933956786?profile=RESIZE_710x

       

      • how perceptions of reality and  aesthetic values and craft have changed .934109721?profile=RESIZE_710x

        934112901?profile=RESIZE_710x

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Snake '1EE safety officer' replied to Tad "living in a world of spin"'s discussion What would someone close to you like to see you change about yourself
"My lady has asked me to get a penis reduction, she says its too big to cope with, says i need to get down under 10 inches.
So i suppose thats what id change."
3 hours ago
Parra power replied to Frankie Fong's discussion WHY SOME CLUBS ARE ALWAYS ON TOP
"& what makes me even more angry is seeing Todd greenberg in the roosters sheds after tonight’s game. "
3 hours ago
Cranky Brad is here!!! replied to Cranky Brad is here!!!'s discussion We must sign David Fifita.
"We need to use Parrys cheapness for a year or two. Sign another good centre on ok money. Nothing insane.  Use parry as a back up and fall to guy like all great clubs do. Throwing him straight into first grade full time is just stupid. Use him as a b…"
4 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Gray Fox's discussion My crazy left field idea while Brown's suspended
"I think terapo for lock if fit or even Nikuore as he has been playing with agreession in the middle which would partially help fill the massive void Brown leaves.   
One more move I would like to see is taka on bench when Fergo returns, especially f…"
4 hours ago
Cranky Brad is here!!! replied to Cranky Brad is here!!!'s discussion We must sign David Fifita.
"If klemmer  is worth 800k, then Fifita is easily worth a million.  "
4 hours ago
Cranky Brad is here!!! replied to Cranky Brad is here!!!'s discussion We must sign David Fifita.
"He is easily worth a million these days.  The blokes a game changer if he has a good spine and players around him. He has to move to a whole new country.for the warriors . "
4 hours ago
DR WONG.MD BSA (THE SLUGG SLAYER replied to Cranky Brad is here!!!'s discussion We must sign David Fifita.
"All you are saying Paul is that you need to buy a premiership. What are the Roosters going to do after Cronk leaves? "
5 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Frankie Fong's discussion WHY SOME CLUBS ARE ALWAYS ON TOP
"The roosters identify talent better than anyone in current comp, and have proven that with the names mentioned above that debuted and then made their name.  They also have a lot of unknown names on minimum or very low contracts relying on the big na…"
5 hours ago
colin hussey replied to Poppa's discussion Nathan Brown was ill disciplined all night and arguably cost us the game and maybe the next 2 as well
"Thing for me Tad, over the past few games, there are two players on the bench who have not performed. 1: Alvaro, while he has moments of good play he is not impacting in both defence and attack, he was better even last year but this year has really…"
5 hours ago
colin hussey replied to Parra power's discussion BROWN FREE TO PLAY FINALS.
"Reverse those two, Kafusi run on 13 and Marata off the bench as needed.
Kafusi is playing at 13 with Wenty, but can also play prop where he has been in the NRL Team previously,  "
6 hours ago
colin hussey replied to Gray Fox's discussion My crazy left field idea while Brown's suspended
"Stone can cover for Mahoney when he goes off, which keeps Gutho in his rightfull spot at fullback, Stone has played 9 in the past with some success but can also provide utility value to also replace whoever goes to lock, if needed. For me Kafusi to…"
6 hours ago
Tad "living in a world of spin" replied to Poppa's discussion Nathan Brown was ill disciplined all night and arguably cost us the game and maybe the next 2 as well
"Colin I have also noted some 19 year olds being given opportunities this weekend. I am sitting on the fence regarding changes to the side as I don,t know enough about the options. One thing we need to consider is that our defense has been steadily i…"
6 hours ago
colin hussey replied to Cranky Brad is here!!!'s discussion We must sign David Fifita.
"Parry is on development contract, is 20 now, 2 years younger than Ramien, how extra to get Ramien over Parry who will likely have a year left for 2020, how do we know he is not potentially better than Ramien without giving him the chances.  
What ge…"
6 hours ago
Blaze replied to Frankie Fong's discussion WHY SOME CLUBS ARE ALWAYS ON TOP
"No matter how much u try to fit the roosters team under the cap it doesn't make any sense. There current team looks better or just as good as  the 2009 Melbourne storm team, that were reported 2million over the cap for that year.
Tedesco, latrel, cr…"
6 hours ago
DR WONG.MD BSA (THE SLUGG SLAYER replied to Frankie Fong's discussion WHY SOME CLUBS ARE ALWAYS ON TOP
"The VS Commodore will be worth more than the range rover in 20yrs time Paul."
6 hours ago
colin hussey replied to Poppa's discussion Nathan Brown was ill disciplined all night and arguably cost us the game and maybe the next 2 as well
"Tad, I think Fergo will be keen to go, despite some weight loss and if its up to around 5kg may actually advantage him but, the issue is more the match fitness part as well.
We have to make changes to the bench even if NB was playing  What the doggi…"
6 hours ago
More…