So basically Jameon Salmon made harsh remarks about Sticky's daughter who has autism to her Brother a number of times in junior games when he was 12 years old .
Yes it is poor behaviour but he was 12 years old , the rubbish Kent is saying about Ricky was just defending his family is laughable .
What was their to defend against ? It happened over a decade ago and he was 12 , If people like Kent can't get that Sticky calling a player a weak gutter dog because of what he did as a 12 year old kid is wrong in every level then they need medical attention .
Replies
I actually thought it might be another issue based on what Kent seemed to be implying
Mick let's say hypothetically Jameon was bullying Sticky's daughter about being autistic , it would be disgraceful and cruel behaviour .
.
Let's say hypothetically Jameon was bullying Sticky's son about his sister being autistic , it would bee disgraceful and cruel behaviour but he was 12 years old , yes at the time you would be ropable beyond belief but he was still a 12 year old child and you can't judge a person on what they did as a kid .
On 360 not one of the morons said " hey but he was a 12 year old child " , they carried on like Jaemon did something a week ago.
I thought from what Kent was saying the daughter was only a part of it. I'm reading between the lines but their is another blog voicing what I thought he was implying.
Anyway I still think Stuart very much in the wrong.
If it was a homophobic slur or bullying then it's even worse for Sticky.
12 years ago was a different landscape to what it is today for homosexuals and how many 12 year old Boys use the F word to describe gays today despite all the education they have received let alone 12 years ago .
Correct Frankie, and in their haste to defend Stuart not one of them asked if Salmon was approached for his side of the story.
Spot on Frankie, and I have two sons on the spectrum. Sticky needs to get some professional help.
Yes Kent is a flop Frankie but if reports on Fox are correct about a one match ban and $20k ish fine then the NRL have whacked Pricky with a feather duster and shown Zero leadership. How very very weak.
I hope Penrith or the Salmon family seek legal advise.
"What was their to defend against..."
I had the same thought.
In fact, I would suggest that by making this public, he has done the exact opposite.
Arrrrr yes Paul Kent the bum journalist who couldnt even cut it in 3rd Grade for Parra, shows his transparent bias yet again.
Does this brain dead goose realise it was words from a 12 YEAR OLD child a billion years ago. FFS if the fine is 20K and two games we really do follow a sport run by dopes and bums......and weak as F pussys who are beholdant to former players who can do and say what ever they want.
So the NRL is considering a 1 game suspension and $20k still soft, Kenty the clown defending his mate was predictable and saying the penalty has nothing to do with footy..blah blah blah what a delusional muppet..
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 8 Next