Josh Hodgson linked with stunning one year deal

So apparently Hodgson is being courted by Newcastle to replace Brailey for 2022, which makes sense, though if it is true if i was Parramatta i would only allow him to play for us in 2022 if not Canberra, ideally i would rather him start rd 1 than Mahoney (petty i know but he made his choice and he can go) but if Canberra would be willing to release him in 2022 i would be grabbing him now and start as quickly as possible with him having an input in our future hookers and developing them, having him for 2022 would give us 2 good years with him with 24' expected to be a decline in performance. I would not want Hodgson going to Newcastle and getting hurt, yes he can get hurt playing for Canberra but he is contracted with them and has been for years, rather him get hurt for a team he is still contracted too then on a loan with another team who only want him for that set time.

Hodgson was set to leave for 2022 before Tom Starling decided to be an idiot and get charged by police but Canberra currently have the issue of wanting to start Starling to keep him happy as he is there future but not wanting to have 800k of their cap on the bench playing roughly 25-30mins or less a game, would not be surprised if that is an ultimatum set by Starling when discussing an extension in wanting to start for 2022. Now he has this charge over his head who knows when it is resolved meaning Hodgson is valuable to Canberra until Starling is cleared, if he is not and is stood down then Hodgson is their hooker for 2022.

Now if Newcastle wanted this deal done, Canberra obviously have final say due to him still having a contract in place, regardless of future he is a Canberra player until minimum after the GF of 2022, so if we mentioned we do not want him going to Newcastle, Canberra obviously will overrule and allow him to go if they want to. Thought this all hinges on Starling, is he going to be allowed to play round 1? will there be a cloud over his head for most of 2022 of possible stand down? 

Then comes the other part, if Hodgson is allowed to leave early, do we take him early? and if we do will Canterbury take Mahoney early? I think Canterbury would love to take Mahoney early though the issue might be can they fit him in the cap? possibly not but his current salary is half of what he is getting with Canterbury from 2023 anyway so perhaps they could fit him in. Yes give Bulldogs Mahoney battered and bruised as a "here you go enjoy" from us and that is why people say keep him in spite, but Canberra (or this case Newcastle) could do the same to someone much more older and fragile and we could be screwed ourselves. Yes if Starling is stood down, that leaves Hodgson as the only logical 9 at the club so you would not want to run him into the ground for seasons sake, or they could as it doesnt affect their future, if they're nearly out of finals contention by mid year they may screw it let's try and go for a last ditch effort and leave Hodgson on for full 80mins stints week in week out that is plausible and will be surprising if Hodgson comes out unscaved.

Ideally i would rather get Hodgson in ASAP and with Rein and perhaps Hands and in 2023 Matt Arthur (it's inevitable, just have to accept it and hope for the best) we can look after Hodgson and preserve him to get the most out of his 2023/24 seasons rather then get him battered and bruised have him play some of 2023 and retire for 24' and have Hands and Arthur thrown to the fire. Granted Hodgson could very well be in line with the club if he is retired by 2024 to help Hands and Arthur but it is even better having them eased in for 2 years under him then in 2025 take over as a starting 9, more so for Matt Arthur being so young it will be better for him to be a 14 in 2024 under Hodgson then take the reigns in 2025.

But what does everyone else think? Let him go to Newcastle and see if he performs? do we want him ASAP at our club or are we content on Mahoney for the year and run the risk Hodgson is ran into the ground from Canberra?

https://www.seriousaboutrl.com/josh-hodgson-linked-with-stunning-one-year-deal-47790/

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • SE i pretty much said most of what you said above about Starling and money etc.

      Though Canberra are willing to pay half of Hodgson's deal (400k) from knowledge Mahoney is on a tad less, now who is to say we have a little bit left over? no real big signings, no massive re-signings who's money starts this year (mainly 2023 onwards) and we were going to up Papali'i's deal for this year before signing for Wests, we had cash to do that, though not much we still have cash. Now of course each club has some money left incase of upgrading development players and maybe mid-season signings due to injuries.

      It is difficult as there are pieces from three clubs that need to be set in place but can be done, but yes unlikely. We have 2-3 spots availalbe in our top 30 and Bulldogs have no money next year, this year however might be different or the same who knows.

      • I can't see us moving Mahoney on early. The idea itself is completely ridiculous. To release him early and replace him with Hodgson before we have to is deadset nuts. Mahoney is one of the best hookers in the game. We'd be cutting our nose off to spite our face.

        Besides, that entire scenario rests on two things out of our control: Starling's court case and Canterbury's cap. We might have a little bit of cash lying around, but no way the Dogs have money to take Mahoney on full freight this year.

        • To replace Mahoney with Hodgson is deadset nuts? Which is precisely what we did. Our club is indeed nuts. 

        • I think it wont happen either, though mainly saying that id rather him stay at Canberra or come to us than go to Newcastle.

          But yes those two things definately determine what happens.

        • SuperEel 22 i think its all Hypotheticals Super, like the Novacc chat that occurred the other day before he got booted back to the homeland.

          • The homeland being Monaco.

            • Yes, he would not be living in downtown Belgrade i think....

               

        • Agree , we have Mahoney on tne cheap. Unless it was in our favour we'd be dumb to move him along so he can go and earn big bucks . The only winner is Reed. 

          • maybe send mahoney to newcastle

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Coryn Hughes replied to LB's discussion Will Manly be smarting next week?
"That's why BA mentions them being a part time team taking the soft option not going to bat for your team mate.
They beat Manly get flogged by Canberra beat the Cows flogged by Redcliffe.This is what they have to even up there best and worst.
My…"
21 minutes ago
Uncle Wizards Sleeve indigenous elder He/Him replied to LB's discussion Will Manly be smarting next week?
"So that says we have a coach that can beat Penrith . The fact we lost to the tigers says we have a poor attitude . And we have for decades. On and off feild leadership is as big a problem as coaching. And that may not necessarily only apply to the…"
3 hours ago
Poupou Escobar replied to LB's discussion Will Manly be smarting next week?
""Friday nights game should have been nearly closed out in the first 25 minutes. We had enough ball and field position to take the wind out of the Phins."
You really think so? At halftime we had 50% possession: iStats/NRL (championdata.com)
If we had…"
3 hours ago
Uncle Wizards Sleeve indigenous elder He/Him replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 8 Team List v Manly Warringah Sea Eagles (ANZAC Round)
"You know that 40/20 is not a persons real name , nor does it divulge who said person is off screen , ya Wally. Could you try any harder to find an excuse to be outraged ?   What the difference between mentioning a podcasters alias and talking about…"
5 hours ago
More…