I Just read a article when Dylan Brown mentioned how he had not seen Cleary after the game , Dylan also basically said that had he done something like that he would be checking on the player . It's common decency to want to check on a player after a game that you were lucky to not of crippled but this Cleary really is a mongrel of a man , no wonder he looks like the devils helper with that chin .
That tackle was as dangerous as you will ever see snd the fact this grub never made his way to seek out Dylan after the game to check on him is a disgrace .
Replies
Terrible tackle. He should probably be missing a finals game but likely he will get 4 weeks
Just been confirmed on nrl.com grade 3, hes out for 5-6weeks depending on if he challenges or not
Right so he won't challenge and get 5 weeks so he avoids missing a finals game
You would guess so
Well he hardly has any grounds to appeal on regardless.
Your point is valid Frankie, if he showed concern after the incident or even looked for him after the game he may have some leniency from the "humans" that judge him. Writing that I have little faith in whoever that will be or even if they have any empathy other..... than me personally giving him 2 extra weeks for the golden boots he wore before I even looked at the charges.....but I am human. Contrary to what some people on here think LOL
Clearys image in the media as a cleanskin is all a facade. The blokes a flog
I don't think he had any obligation to see if Brown was ok - Dylan didn't miss a single second of the game. He was clearly fine.
Cleary should have made a point of apologising though. It was a really dangerous tackle that could have ended tragically. That deserved a follow up.
What did you expect. He is an arrogant grub like most of the Panthers players.
Agreed Brissy. It is the most dangerous thing in out game and can have the most severe consequences as we have seen before. Whilst most are unintentional it needs to be stamped out altogether.
I think he was more concerned about the what about me me thing Givers and takers?
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next