What's everyone's thoughts on a six man bench.with the game getting faster and the growing amount of hia's and injuries would it benefit the competition.
Views: 377
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
I think we all have more or less the same idea. The other advantage is if you have a young playmaker you want to blood, you could throw him in with 20 to go in a blow out game. Gets him some valuable game time, rests your starter.
Keep it at 8 interchanges but name a 20 squad and all players are allowed to play. This way, you can name a second hooker on the bench and only use him if needed. This will also take care of the consussion problem.
all 20 players do the warm up anyway so just allow a 7 man bench
"No he isn't and never will be if he isn't playing the role in reserve grade instead of sitting on the bench in first grade. If BA is determined to keep him in first grade he might as well play Jim at fullback. "
Replies
Oh jeez a wierd mental triangle. Next question now is who is killing who???
I think we all have more or less the same idea. The other advantage is if you have a young playmaker you want to blood, you could throw him in with 20 to go in a blow out game. Gets him some valuable game time, rests your starter.
Yes would be good to have an outside back also
The same principle woukd apply
Won't work
Why ?
To many rules and there is already a steady format in process
I would go six on the bench aswell as six interchange I know people want fatigue but with the speed of the game there is plenty maybe to much
Keep it at 8 interchanges but name a 20 squad and all players are allowed to play. This way, you can name a second hooker on the bench and only use him if needed. This will also take care of the consussion problem.
all 20 players do the warm up anyway so just allow a 7 man bench
I think it is a great idea.