You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Name and shame the players? You must mean the team list it comes out Tuesday that will have them all."
"I was one of the people on here that wanted Flanagan and a few of them said "We don't want a drug cheat at Parramatta". St. George have been up and down with some of their performances but Flanagan is getting a pretty weak squad to be competitive.…"
"That's what a strong club committed to success would do (I said 3 years ago the moment the decision is made that we will not win a premiership under Arthur he needs to be moved on - irrespective of who is available). Still waiting."
"Smartest and best balanced comment I have read on here in a long time."
Replies
Crazy stuff and we only have 500 in our cap left to offer hayne apparently. Go figure.
Amazing how some clubs just get everything rubber stamped by the NRL no questions asked........
If the dogs pay half for the Morris I like to half them
and how do they get away with swapping Abbey for Priest and now cap-compliant?
All they let go were sam kas and graham to lose 1m in cap? But they are reportedly paying a fair chunk of Grahams salary out of 2018 cap.
How?
SCOTT SEWARD (EX-CEO):
"We do need, and what we’ll do, is we’ll actually sit down and go through TPA’s as a whole. There’s a few different options. I’ve spoken to Todd Greenberg about the way that CANTERBURY, and the best options, I’ve spoken to Wayne Beavis to tell us how f$%^ed we are, um, and the like."
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm........
Unfortunately it gives rise to nothing more solid than "hmmmmm".
Seward's been coming out saying the NRL hung him out to dry, scapegoated him. He's packing shelves or whatever. He's fighting to stay out of gaol.
As I see it he has no apparent reason to protect anyone and if anyone has a motive to blow the whistle it's him.
He even has a job so has nothing to complain about.
Truth is he wasn't up to the task and got advice from Greenberg about how to structure the salary cap like the bulldogs do. The subsequent breaches are therefore in part attributable to those discussions with Greenberg on how bulldogs structure their tpas.
Everyone read the words again "I’ve spoken to Todd Greenberg about the way that CANTERBURY, and the best options." This is past tense, as such the assertion to be gleened from this comment is that what he had done up until at least the point he made in that comment was wholly or substantially due to the advice Greenberg gave him.
Let's also not forget the important point that his comments about Canterbury were made in circumstances that would make highly likely to be both reliable and truthful. What we have here is a person making comments at a time when he believes no one else will hear, let alone read them. Point being it would be easy to submit them as fact on any legal test.
This my friend is far more than hmmmmmmmmmmmmm. There is no doubt more to this but the reality is this is extremely incriminating for the bulldogs and the fact the media either A) doesn't have the intelligence to pick up on this or B) chooses to ignore it, is of great concern.
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next