Keeper: M.Jennings or Jarryd Hayne.

Decison has to be made on one of these 2 in my eyes I don't think we can afford to keep both.

My preference right now is Hayne.

Leverage I believe is with Jennings as he has a 2 year option to stay or go.

Also think with Gutho being our play anywhere in the backline guy we have enough to cover if either decide to leave.

Basically it's nie on a million dollars in cap locked up in that centre spot on 2 guys who are coming to the end of there careers.

With the signing of Fergusson I think one of the mentioned needs to go.I think inevitably if one does leave it'll be Jarryd as he's on a one year deal without too much security.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Hayne. Bye bye Jennings.
  • Jennings has taken up his 2 year option . We are stuck with his lazy efforts and dumb defensive plays .
  • Definitely Hayne

    Hayne is driven to win a premiership with us

  • I'd definitely take Hayne Jennings is shit.
  • FACE THE FACTS! No club is going to pay Jennings a reported $800,000pa for the next 2 seasons.We are stuck with him taking up 9% of our salary cap-great list management by the Eels!

    Best outcome would be for us to heavily subsidize his salary-say 50% and move him on.

     As for Hayne-thanks but no thanks -we need new blood-we should be looking at all other clubs under 20"s teams and picking out new talent whose best years are ahead of them not behind them

    On another note, Manly's hooker is off contract at the end of this year-he would be a much better pick up than the Cronulla's second string hooker

  • Both and Ferguson. Simple.

  • Does anyone know if Hayne actually wants to stay?

    Jennings is in a form slump and will come out of it.

  • The way they are playing at the moment, I would prefer Hayne. But Jennings has taken up his option, and no one is picking up his $800,000 salary for him to leave, unless we pay a fair chunk of it. That said, over their careers, Jennings has been much more consistent than Hayne, and I am hoping he comes out of his form slump. What worries me is he is guaranteed that $800k for the next couple of years, so where is the incentive to perform?

  • The way they are playing at the moment, I would prefer Hayne. But Jennings has taken up his option, and no one is picking up his $800,000 salary for him to leave, unless we pay a fair chunk of it. That said, over their careers, Jennings has been much more consistent than Hayne, and I am hoping he comes out of his form slump. What worries me is he is guaranteed that $800k for the next couple of years, so where is the incentive to perform?

    • How bout 400 k and we pay half to the lucky side that need an expirenced centre that's an option.

      Move Gutho to left centre.

      Pay Hayne the 400 K we saved.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Prof. Daz's discussion R4 V TIGERS: FREUD SAYS ‘WORK THROUGH’ IT, DEAR EELS
"Then again, tired middle opens up the ruck for Api to do his thing.
We will give him space but will halves help him. Our spine is much better with Gutho and Brown in there."
14 minutes ago
JB. Prints of Parra replied to Cʜɪᴇғ -'s discussion Big News On Lomax
"What I could see happening is Lomax to the Chooks and Suaalii to the Eels "
40 minutes ago
Cumberland Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғ -'s discussion Big News On Lomax
"Can anyone actually see this happening. Lomax at the Eels? "
47 minutes ago
Electric Eel 2 replied to Poppa's discussion Players and Values and Judgements to make
"Hardly the point that I was making!"
1 hour ago
More…