You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Win comfortably. "
"What i take from this story with BA, is that BA plans to be here long term? "
"To forward heavy and relying on the power game.
This is why we will never win a premiership with BA coaching.
He hasn't adapted to how the game has changed. Not sure if it's stubbornness or he has no idea how to run a different game plan but enough…"
This is why we will never win a premiership with BA coaching.
He hasn't adapted to how the game has changed. Not sure if it's stubbornness or he has no idea how to run a different game plan but enough…"
"My thoughts exactly. "
Replies
Sutton once again was the Donkey's best player, Dogs didn't get one penalty all second half.
I guess technically by the letter of the law that is a penalty, however that means there would have to be a penalty for players deviating and blocking runners on pretty much every kick chase every game. All we ask for is consistency, yet we never get it.
Correct
Well that should put a hole in the whole 'dogs get favourable treatment because Greenberg' theory.
Not really , it’s always been at the judiciary that’s been questionable . History shows they’ve gotten away lightly many times . There’s 100 threads on here with video evidence accompanied by the jury’s suspensions (or lack of ) to back up the “ theory “ .
That didn't take long.
It was a penalty, only just, but it was a penalty nonetheless. If the Dogs were good enough they would have put that game away in the last ten minutes.
It keeps a team from Qld in the mix.
Like their win over Wests its good for ratings